Keyword summary
37% 12 analyzed articles/videos 5,781 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Finance results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 1,798 hits . Analysis detected 22,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,387 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (29,701 of 34,978 keywords). This Finance is better (less manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group. Finance
Keyword details
Total words: 27,387
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score12 analyzed articles27.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst