Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 704 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal-Judge results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 66.8% saturation with 1,423 hits . Analysis detected 4,401 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,129 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 93% (2,829 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal-Judge is worse (more manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group. Federal-Judge
Keyword details
Total words: 2,129
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.5% percentile 8.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 66.8% 66.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.6% 15.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 19.3% 19.3% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Keyword 66.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 7.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.4% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Horn Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst