Author summary
50% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,198 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ruben Vives results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 2,043 hits . Analysis detected 17,773 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,311 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 8% (5,909 of 6,359 authors). This Ruben Vives is better (less manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group. Ruben Vives
Author details
Total words: 27,311
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.1% percentile 1.3% BS Score7 analyzed articles27.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst