Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,449 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paige St. John results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hindsight Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 1,305 hits . Analysis detected 9,445 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,565 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,780 of 6,628 authors). This Paige St. John is better (less manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group. Paige St. John
Author details
Total words: 12,565
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst