Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,603 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Connor Sheets results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hindsight Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 927 hits . Analysis detected 8,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,412 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,409 of 6,244 authors). This Connor Sheets is better (less manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group. Connor Sheets
Author details
Total words: 10,412
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst