Keyword summary
24% 8 analyzed articles/videos 5,716 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ebola Virus results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Authority , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 2,239 hits . Analysis detected 10,197 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,553 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (36,496 of 37,536 keywords). This Ebola Virus is better (less manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group. Ebola Virus
Keyword details
Total words: 20,553
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.8% percentile 1.2% BS Score8 analyzed articles20.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst