ABC News20%

Researchers launch study on Ebola treatments as Congo outbreak worsens 32%

By LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer0%

7/2/2026, 4:25:37 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 123 hits. Analysis detected 685 faulty-reasoning hits from 446 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41% and a BS Rank of 32% (14,473 of 21,171 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 68.40% of the article peer group.

Researchers began a highly anticipated study of two possible Ebola treatments on Thursday in hopes of fighting the still-growing outbreak in eastern Congo, as the World Health Organization announced the enrollment of the first participant. 
The virus causing this outbreak, called Bundibugyo, is less common than others that cause Ebola disease and there are no specific treatments or vaccines for it. 
Already more than 1,400 people have been diagnosed and 438 have died, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said Thursday. 
Standard supportive care, especially if started early, can help and the WHO says more than 200 people have recovered. 
But there’s an urgent need for better options. 
The trial “offers real hope that we can deliver concrete results for  and with  the communities at the heart of the outbreak,” Tedros said in a statement. 
Researchers will be testing if two drugs could improve survival. 
One is Gilead Sciences’ remdesivir, a broad-acting antiviral approved to treat COVID-19 but that has shown some hints in lab tests that it may help fight the currently spreading virus. 
The other is Mapp Biopharmaceutical’s experimental MBP134, antibodies engineered to target Ebola viruses including Bundibugyo. 
All patients enrolled in the trial would receive today’s best standard care and be randomly assigned to also receive remdesivir, MBP134, both or neither, said WHO research adviser Dr. 
Vasee Moorthy. 
Survival will be tracked for 28 days after starting treatment. 
It could take months and possibly as many as 1,000 study participants to tell if either drug works, Moorthy cautioned, explaining that scientists could tell more quickly, and with fewer patients, if one or the other turns out to be highly effective. 
Currently the study is being offered only in one Ebola treatment center in Congo’s Ituri province. 
The region has been hit hard by violence, including toward healthcare workers trying to fight a virus spread by contact with sick patients’ bodily fluids. 
Officials plan to expand to other locations once it is safe to do so. 
Moorthy said enough of each drug had been donated by Gilead and the U.S. government, which has funded MBP134 research and owns those doses, for the trial. 
If either proves effective, the next step would be ensuring patients can continue to access the treatment outside the study. 
The WHO-supported trial is a collaboration between Congo’s national biomedical research institute INRB, Britain’s Oxford University, Antwerp's Institute of Tropical Medicine and other international health groups. 
—- 
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. 
The AP is solely responsible for all content. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.3%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 3.1%ABC News: 2.2%Confirmation Bias12.3%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 1.1%ABC News: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 3.4%ABC News: 3.0%Availability Heuristic6.7%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 9.4%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 2.4%ABC News: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias9.4%This article: 14.3%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 5.7%ABC News: 6.7%Framing Effect14.3%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.3%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 1.1%ABC News: 0.4%Status Quo Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 18.8%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 13.8%ABC News: 2.4%Optimism Bias18.8%This article: 1.8%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.4%ABC News: 1.0%Pessimism Bias1.8%This article: 12.1%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 5.5%ABC News: 7.6%Negativity Bias12.1%This article: 7.8%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 2.0%ABC News: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias7.8%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 1.5%ABC News: 2.2%Halo Effect5.8%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 27.6%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 8.4%ABC News: 3.3%Appeal to Authority27.6%This article: 5.8%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 1.5%ABC News: 0.9%False Dilemma5.8%This article: 3.1%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.8%ABC News: 0.2%Slippery Slope3.1%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 3.4%ABC News: 2.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.5%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 4.9%ABC News: 4.3%Appeal to Emotion6.5%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.5%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 1.1%ABC News: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.5%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.3%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 1.1%ABC News: 1.8%Unattributed Quote4.3%This article: 6.5%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 3.3%ABC News: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection6.5%This article: 1.8%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.4%ABC News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice1.8%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%LAURAN NEERGAARD AP medical writer: 0.0%ABC News: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

446 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers28%attributed speech319writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageTedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageTedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageVasee Moorthy • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageVasee Moorthy • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageVasee Moorthy • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageAssociated Press • 8 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
48 attributed words38% of attributed speech84% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Quote-first Misdirection+60.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus: 60.4%60.4%Unattributed Quote+39.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus: 39.6%39.6%Biased Writer Voice-2.5 ptsWriter: 2.5%Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.