Keyword summary
68% 35 analyzed articles/videos 9,464 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dodgers results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Halo Effect , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 6,200 hits . Analysis detected 40,653 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,750 analyzed words across 35 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (24,813 of 37,536 keywords). This Dodgers is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group. Dodgers
Keyword details
Total words: 35,750
Article count: 35
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score35 analyzed articles35.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.3% 17.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 4.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst