Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,135 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mirjam Swanson results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 1,049 hits . Analysis detected 7,071 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,540 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (4,124 of 6,528 authors). This Mirjam Swanson is better (less manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group. Mirjam Swanson
Author details
Total words: 8,540
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.3% 12.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst