Keyword summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos4,269 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dobbs V Jackson Womens Health Organization results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 5,004 hits. Analysis detected 37,313 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,419 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (21,629 of 37,536 keywords). This Dobbs V Jackson Womens Health Organization is better (less manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group.
Dobbs V Jackson Womens Health Organization
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

42% percentile
025507510042.4% percentile
2.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles28.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 17.6%17.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos