Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Regina Mahone results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 838 hits . Analysis detected 8,728 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,360 authors). This Regina Mahone is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Regina Mahone
Author details
Total words: 7,656
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.6% 6.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 7.1% 7.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.9% 10.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 2.0% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst