Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 933 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Rankin results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 798 hits . Analysis detected 6,222 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,276 of 6,628 authors). This Lauren Rankin is worse (more manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group. Lauren Rankin
Author details
Total words: 3,732
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.8% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 21.4% 21.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 20.8% 20.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 17.7% 17.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.1% 11.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.7% 6.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 21.4%, sitewide 2.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 17.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Author 7.6%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst