BS Summary: This article contains 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 29% saturation with 271 hits. Analysis detected 2,769 faulty-reasoning hits from 933 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 67.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (5,366 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the article peer group.

It has been 250 years since the U.S. declared independence at one of the most tenuous moments in our history. 
We now stand at another tenuous moment. 
With an autocrat firmly in the White House, a sycophantic legislative branch, and a judiciary dominated by far right conservatives, it feels hard to celebrate the United States and its “democracy,” which hangs by a thin thread. 
In the run-up to this anniversary, patriotic reflections have abounded, whitewashing U.S. history and seeking to erase its more sinister chapters. 
This pageantry has also erased any mention of a positive practice that has run throughout American history  the practice of safe abortion. 
That’s right, abortion has been a part of American life since the very beginning. 
Despite attempts by far right extremists to eradicate it out of existence and erase its history in U.S. colonial and republican history, safe abortion has been a consistent throughline over the past 250 years and beyond. 
Abortion access has been decimated in recent years. 
Before the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. 
Wade in 2022, Republican-dominated state legislatures successfully forced the closure of more than 160 abortion clinics from 2012 to 2019 alone. 
States like Alabama and Texas passed draconian early abortion bans, designed to force the Supreme Court to test and potentially end the constitutional right to an abortion. 
Finally, in June 2022, after Donald Trump successfully appointed three far right justices during his first term, Roe v. 
Wade fell in Dobbs v. 
Jackson Women’s Health Organization. 
Writing for the majority in the Dobbs ruling, Justice Samuel Alito argued that abortion is “entirely unknown in American law,” and the right to a legal abortion is “not deeply rooted in the Nation’s history and tradition.” 
In this interpretation, Alito, as he so often finds himself, is flat-out wrong. 
Abortion, a matter of individual liberty and personhood, isn’t just foundational based on the U.S. 
Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, which established the right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” 
It was also common, legal, and acceptable across communities and states throughout the colonial era and the first half-century of the U.S. republic. 
Colonial American life included abortion. 
It was so common and acceptable that the venerated Benjamin Franklin intentionally added information on how to perform an at-home abortion to a reference book he published, The American Instructor, reprinting within it recipes for herbal abortifacients and contraceptives from a 1734 medical handbook entitled Every Man His Own Doctor: The Poor Planter’s Physician. 
Benjamin Franklin, the man who graces our $100 bill, didn’t just endorse safe abortion  he helped teach people how to do it themselves. 
In the late 18th century and early 19th century, abortion was legal and acceptable to the point of quickening, or when the pregnant person can feel the fetus move. 
This occurs during the second trimester of pregnancy, typically from 16-20 weeks into a pregnancy. 
With little in the way of scientific methods for determining how long a pregnancy was, quickening was the most common and often the only surefire way to determine whether a person was pregnant. 
And because abortions were largely performed by midwives or Indigenous healers  trusted, community-based experts and providers of care  abortion was typically kept in the realm of women’s work. 
This also helped enslaved women inhibit pregnancy and have abortions through their private use of cotton; enslavers knew little to nothing about the herbal remedies for unwanted pregnancy that were known among African and Indigenous healers. 
Enslaved women would chew cotton root and bark to resist childbearing following sexual assault by their enslavers. 
Abortion was a key means of asserting the little independence that enslaved women could claim. 
The nation’s first abortion ban was not enacted until 1821, nearly a half-century after the U.S. declared independence, when Connecticut passed a law that banned the use of “poison” to cause a miscarriage. 
This could have been targeted at midwives and Indigenous healers who had, for centuries, used natural herbs to induce abortions. 
Regardless of its target, it marked the first time in U.S. history that abortion, in any way, had been criminalized. 
Abortion bans began to spread not because of hostility to the procedure, but hostility to those who provided them. 
Midwives and Indigenous healers were the trusted experts, and as physicians began to establish themselves as the sole health care authorities, abortion came under scrutiny. 
With the establishment of the American Medical Association in 1847, physicians began a coordinated campaign to smear midwives and criminalize abortion, a procedure they were unable to perform. 
It took time, but by 1910, abortion was banned nationwide. 
However, that means that for more than 130 years after the nation’s founding, abortion was legal in some parts of the country. 
That’s more than half of our entire history. 
Add to that the years that abortion was protected nationwide by Roe v. 
Wade, from 1973 to 2022, and abortion has been legal in some or all parts of the country for more than 180 years of U.S. history. 
And yet Justice Alito and far right ideologues have erased this overwhelming part of the country’s history from our story. 
It is essential that people in the U.S. embrace the real history and legacy of abortion, one that is foundational to realizing the much-lauded ideals of liberty and independence. 
If this milestone feels difficult to celebrate, remember this: For as long as this country has been here, and even before its founding, people on this land have been providing and having safe abortions. 
That is a history worth celebrating. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 21.0%Lauren Rankin: 8.6%Truthout: 5.8%Confirmation Bias21.0%This article: 1.4%Lauren Rankin: 1.3%Truthout: 0.8%Anchoring Bias1.4%This article: 4.8%Lauren Rankin: 1.2%Truthout: 3.4%Availability Heuristic4.8%This article: 2.0%Lauren Rankin: 0.5%Truthout: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic2.0%This article: 6.6%Lauren Rankin: 1.7%Truthout: 0.4%Hindsight Bias6.6%This article: 11.1%Lauren Rankin: 4.1%Truthout: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias11.1%This article: 6.2%Lauren Rankin: 8.9%Truthout: 10.0%Framing Effect6.2%This article: 0.0%Lauren Rankin: 0.0%Truthout: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Rankin: 0.0%Truthout: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Lauren Rankin: 0.6%Truthout: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect2.4%This article: 6.2%Lauren Rankin: 1.6%Truthout: 1.0%Optimism Bias6.2%This article: 0.8%Lauren Rankin: 0.6%Truthout: 2.3%Pessimism Bias0.8%This article: 26.9%Lauren Rankin: 11.1%Truthout: 12.2%Negativity Bias26.9%This article: 0.0%Lauren Rankin: 0.0%Truthout: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 13.7%Lauren Rankin: 4.7%Truthout: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error13.7%This article: 0.0%Lauren Rankin: 0.0%Truthout: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Lauren Rankin: 2.5%Truthout: 1.9%In-Group Bias4.0%This article: 4.0%Lauren Rankin: 4.3%Truthout: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.0%This article: 11.5%Lauren Rankin: 5.0%Truthout: 1.0%Halo Effect11.5%This article: 0.0%Lauren Rankin: 0.0%Truthout: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Rankin: 0.0%Truthout: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.9%Lauren Rankin: 0.7%Truthout: 1.2%Recency Bias2.9%This article: 2.1%Lauren Rankin: 0.5%Truthout: 0.3%Primacy Effect2.1%This article: 0.0%Lauren Rankin: 0.0%Truthout: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Lauren Rankin: 7.6%Truthout: 1.6%Ad Hominem1.4%This article: 2.1%Lauren Rankin: 0.5%Truthout: 0.5%Straw Man2.1%This article: 14.3%Lauren Rankin: 8.2%Truthout: 3.7%Appeal to Authority14.3%This article: 2.0%Lauren Rankin: 0.5%Truthout: 1.9%False Dilemma2.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Rankin: 0.0%Truthout: 1.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Rankin: 0.0%Truthout: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 29.0%Lauren Rankin: 17.7%Truthout: 7.7%Hasty Generalization29.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Rankin: 0.0%Truthout: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Rankin: 0.0%Truthout: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 12.2%Lauren Rankin: 6.4%Truthout: 8.8%Appeal to Emotion12.2%This article: 4.7%Lauren Rankin: 2.0%Truthout: 1.7%Begging the Question4.7%This article: 13.5%Lauren Rankin: 4.6%Truthout: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)13.5%This article: 0.0%Lauren Rankin: 0.0%Truthout: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Rankin: 0.0%Truthout: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 3.2%Lauren Rankin: 0.8%Truthout: 0.1%Appeal to Nature3.2%This article: 2.8%Lauren Rankin: 0.7%Truthout: 0.4%Composition/Division2.8%This article: 5.5%Lauren Rankin: 2.8%Truthout: 2.7%Anecdotal5.5%This article: 3.9%Lauren Rankin: 1.0%Truthout: 0.1%No True Scotsman3.9%This article: 11.5%Lauren Rankin: 2.9%Truthout: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.5%This article: 0.0%Lauren Rankin: 0.0%Truthout: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Rankin: 0.0%Truthout: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Rankin: 0.0%Truthout: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Rankin: 0.0%Truthout: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Rankin: 0.0%Truthout: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.0%Lauren Rankin: 1.0%Truthout: 1.5%Unattributed Quote4.0%This article: 7.6%Lauren Rankin: 2.9%Truthout: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection7.6%This article: 23.2%Lauren Rankin: 20.8%Truthout: 9.5%Biased Writer Voice23.2%This article: 8.9%Lauren Rankin: 6.7%Truthout: 2.9%Indoctrination8.9%This article: 17.1%Lauren Rankin: 21.4%Truthout: 7.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias17.1%This article: 2.3%Lauren Rankin: 0.6%Truthout: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Lauren Rankin: 0.0%Truthout: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

933 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker4.0%attributed speech896writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageJustice Samuel Alito • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 54 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Justice Samuel Alito

100%flagged-word coverage
37 attributed words100% of attributed speech95% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Justice Samuel Alito: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+96.2 ptsWriter: 3.8%Justice Samuel Alito: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-24.1 ptsWriter: 24.1%Justice Samuel Alito: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-17.9 ptsWriter: 17.9%Justice Samuel Alito: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-9.3 ptsWriter: 9.3%Justice Samuel Alito: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -2.3 ptsWriter: 2.3%Justice Samuel Alito: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.