Keyword summary
82%3 analyzed articles/videos2,757 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Department Of War results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 2,230 hits. Analysis detected 18,371 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,145 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 71% (10,896 of 37,536 keywords). This Department Of War is worse (more manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group.
Department Of War
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
71%Department Of War (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,145
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

71% percentile
025507510071.0% percentile
4.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 22.0%22.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.0%15.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate