Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 719 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defense Budget results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 1,345 hits . Analysis detected 9,829 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,569 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (32,204 of 37,533 keywords). This Defense Budget is better (less manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group. Defense Budget
Keyword details
Total words: 12,569
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst