Mike Johnson Accidentally Tanks Defense Budget Bill Over SAVE Act 57%

By Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling62%

6/30/2026, 1:05:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 70.5% saturation with 232 hits. Analysis detected 1,079 faulty-reasoning hits from 329 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54% and a BS Rank of 57% (9,488 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the article peer group.

A procedural vote on the National Defense Authorization Act failed to pass the House Tuesday, in no small part because the SAVE America Act was attached to it. 
The lower chamber voted 198–224 to reject the rule, with 14 Republicans joining Democrats to oppose the last-minute addition of Donald Trump’s voter restriction bill to the proposed Pentagon budget. 
Representatives Tim Burchett, Eric Burlison, Eli Crane, Randy Fine, Andy Harris, Anna Paulina Luna, Max Miller, Chip Roy, Keith Self, Victoria Spartz, Mike Turner, Thomas Massie, and Lauren Boebert all voted “no.” 
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise switched his vote, as well, but only so that Republicans could readdress the matter in future. 
The stalled NDAA vote is a major blow to leaders of both parties, who have historically passed the defense spending package with minimal partisan objections. 
But the wide rejection also illustrates the low level of support behind the SAVE America Act, despite repeated insistence from the White House that it needs to be turned into law. 
Since Trump lost the 2020 election, he and his allies have amped up their base over contrived claims of voter fraud, a statistical nonissue in U.S. elections. 
Trump has worked overtime to force his unpopular election reform proposals through the legislature, throwing confirmation hearings and bipartisan bill signings to the wayside while demanding Republicans prioritize passing the SAVE America Act. 
The backlash to the bill—which was introduced months ago—has been grave, so much so that it gummed up efforts to fund Homeland Security for several months. 
Republicans eventually had to bail on the package to end the congressional gridlock. 
Trump has nonetheless opted to make it a legislative priority once again, effectively paralyzing the House for another week. 
House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters Tuesday that the lower chamber would work on the matter for another day and a half and try to hold another vote by the end of the week. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 17.6%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 4.3%newrepublic.com: 6.1%Confirmation Bias17.6%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.7%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.9%newrepublic.com: 3.3%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 7.6%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.0%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic7.6%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.3%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 21.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 9.7%newrepublic.com: 8.0%Framing Effect21.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect4.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.7%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.4%newrepublic.com: 2.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 62.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 17.8%newrepublic.com: 13.3%Negativity Bias62.0%This article: 6.4%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.3%newrepublic.com: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias6.4%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.7%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.3%newrepublic.com: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.8%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.7%newrepublic.com: 1.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.8%newrepublic.com: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 10.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.6%newrepublic.com: 3.8%Ad Hominem10.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 1.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 4.1%newrepublic.com: 3.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 9.4%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.3%newrepublic.com: 1.9%False Dilemma9.4%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.8%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.6%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 5.5%newrepublic.com: 8.0%Hasty Generalization7.6%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.9%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.2%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 8.1%newrepublic.com: 6.3%Appeal to Emotion8.2%This article: 6.4%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.3%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Begging the Question6.4%This article: 26.1%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 4.1%newrepublic.com: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)26.1%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.8%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.4%newrepublic.com: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.3%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 20.4%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.9%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)20.4%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.3%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.6%newrepublic.com: 2.3%Unattributed Quote10.3%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.0%newrepublic.com: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 70.5%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 17.6%newrepublic.com: 15.5%Biased Writer Voice70.5%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 2.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 37.4%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 8.8%newrepublic.com: 7.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias37.4%This article: 3.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.2%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

329 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers33%attributed speech222writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Scalise • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 19 words • 100.0% coverageMike Johnson • 34 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
52 attributed words49% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning B+68.0 ptsWriter: 32.0%Donald Trump: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+28.4 ptsWriter: 71.6%Donald Trump: 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning -4.5 ptsWriter: 4.5%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.