Keyword summary
94%3 analyzed articles/videos969 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dearborn results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 1,885 hits. Analysis detected 10,862 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,098 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (16,750 of 36,451 keywords). This Dearborn is worse (more manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Dearborn
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
54%Dearborn (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,098
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

54% percentile
025507510054.0% percentile
3.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 17.1%17.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.6%8.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate