Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,273 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel-Lurie results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Negativity Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 201 hits . Analysis detected 2,691 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,092 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (30,685 of 34,417 keywords). This Daniel-Lurie is better (less manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group. Daniel-Lurie
Keyword details
Total words: 5,092
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst