Keyword summary
62% 57 analyzed articles/videos 51,269 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cybersecurity results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 17,021 hits . Analysis detected 167,602 faulty-reasoning hits from 214,053 analyzed words across 57 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (32,477 of 34,833 keywords). This Cybersecurity is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group. Cybersecurity
Keyword details
Total words: 214,053
Article count: 57
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.8% percentile 1.4% BS Score57 analyzed articles214.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst