Keyword summary
14%6 analyzed articles/videos1,924 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Criminal Charges results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 1,285 hits. Analysis detected 8,768 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,086 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (31,785 of 34,832 keywords). This Criminal Charges is better (less manipulative) than 91.30% of the peer group.
Criminal Charges
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
9%Criminal Charges (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

9% percentile
02550751008.7% percentile
1.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate