Natrona County Circuit Court initial appearances (7/17/26–7/20/26) 1%

By Greg Hirst3%

7/20/2026, 11:33:34 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 6 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 111 faulty-reasoning hits from 517 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 1% (21,726 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.30% of the article peer group.

CASPER, Wyo.  Provided below are the defendants and charges from appearances in Natrona County Circuit Court on Friday, July 17 and Monday, July 20. 
The Honorable Seventh Judicial Circuit Court Judge Sweet presided. 
All defendants entering not guilty pleas or charged with felonies are presumed innocent until convicted or pleading guilty. 
Charges may be amended in future proceedings. 
Pleas on felony charges are not entered in circuit court, though bond conditions are set. 
Misdemeanor charges included in the same case advance with the felony and to district court, where a formal plea is entered. 
A bail bondsman can post a surety bond, typically requiring at least 15%. 
A “personal recognizance” or “signature” bond means there is no money required to get out, but the defendant could owe the full amount if they fail to appear. 
Factors affecting bond and sentencing include the nature of the crime, the weight of the evidence, ties to the community, and the defendant’s criminal history, including current bonds or active probations. 
For probation revocations, the state is only required to prove the allegations in an affidavit for revocation “to a preponderance of the evidence.” 
For defendants denying probation violations, a new bond is set. 
For purposes of this document, admissions and denials are represented as guilty and not guilty pleas, respectively. 
Fees for certain convictions may include $150 to the Crime Victims Compensation Fund, $70 in court costs and $50 to Drug Court assessment. 
Only additional fines and restitution amounts are reported below. 
Felonies and engrossed misdemeanors 
David Allen Strong, 27  Possession of a Controlled Substance: Third or Subsequent upon Conviction (THC) 
$5,000 cash or surety bond 
Adam Michael Lacey, 37  Robbery, Theft 
$100,000 cash-only bond 
Ian Duane Lembke, 38  Possession of Methamphetamine: Felony Weight, Possession of a Controlled Substance: Third or Subsequent upon Conviction (Fentanyl), Possession of a Controlled Substance: Third or Subsequent upon Conviction (Methamphetamine) 
Laramie James Stamper, 37  Burglary, Theft 
$15,000 cash or surety bond 
Anthony Dane Pittman, 38  Possession of Child Sexual Abuse Materials x12, Voyeurism x2 
Tanas Laquane Welch , 16  Aggravated Assault and Battery: Threatening with Drawn/Deadly Weapon x5, Possession of a Deadly Weapon with Unlawful Intent, Property Destruction 
$100,000 cash or surety bond 
Quincey Jonathan Eureste , 18  Aggravated Assault and Battery: Threatening with Drawn/Deadly Weapon x5, Possession of a Deadly Weapon with Unlawful Intent, Property Destruction 
John Calvin Mates, 39  Burglary, Criminal Trespass, Theft: Misdemeanor 
$7,000 cash or surety bond 
Alicia Nicole Turner, 35  Possession of a Controlled Substance: Third or Subsequent upon Conviction (THC) 
$2,500 cash or surety bond 
Guilty and no-contest pleas 
Austin Laughman, 32  Domestic Battery 
Five days jail, remainder of six months suspended, one year supervised probation 
Brandon Tilton, 31  DUI 
Six months suspended, one year supervised probation 
$470 fines and court costs 
Auburn Bell, 27  Battery x2, Possession of Methamphetamine, Interference 
$6,000 cash or surety bond 
Joseph John Peters, 40  DUI: Third in 10 Years 
Sylvia San Javier, 51  Theft, Criminal Trespass 
$3,500 cash or surety bond 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 2.5%oilcity.news: 2.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Greg Hirst: 1.1%oilcity.news: 0.7%Anchoring Bias2.5%This article: 4.4%Greg Hirst: 2.3%oilcity.news: 1.9%Availability Heuristic4.4%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.4%oilcity.news: 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.3%oilcity.news: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Greg Hirst: 1.7%oilcity.news: 4.4%Framing Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.2%oilcity.news: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.2%oilcity.news: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.4%oilcity.news: 3.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.8%oilcity.news: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 3.8%oilcity.news: 3.6%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 1.2%oilcity.news: 2.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 1.1%oilcity.news: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.6%oilcity.news: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.9%oilcity.news: 2.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 1.3%oilcity.news: 0.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 1.7%Greg Hirst: 1.6%oilcity.news: 2.2%Appeal to Authority1.7%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.8%oilcity.news: 1.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 1.2%oilcity.news: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.8%oilcity.news: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.5%oilcity.news: 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.7%oilcity.news: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.4%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 1.4%oilcity.news: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.7%Greg Hirst: 2.8%oilcity.news: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.7%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 1.0%oilcity.news: 4.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.3%oilcity.news: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 1.7%Greg Hirst: 1.2%oilcity.news: 1.7%Biased Writer Voice1.7%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.1%oilcity.news: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.0%oilcity.news: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Hirst: 0.1%oilcity.news: 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

517 words analyzed.

Speakers

14speakers37%attributed speech326writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Allen Strong • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageAdam Michael Lacey • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageIan Duane Lembke • 32 words • 0.0% coverageLaramie James Stamper • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageAnthony Dane Pittman • 14 words • 0.0% coverageTanas Laquane Welch • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageQuincey Jonathan Eureste • 25 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Calvin Mates • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageAlicia Nicole Turner • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageAustin Laughman • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageBrandon Tilton • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageAuburn Bell • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJoseph John Peters • 10 words • 0.0% coverageSylvia San Javier • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ian Duane Lembke

0%flagged-word coverage
32 attributed words17% of attributed speech26% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.8 ptsWriter: 2.8%Ian Duane Lembke: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.