BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 228 hits. Analysis detected 970 faulty-reasoning hits from 861 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (14,062 of 20,518 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the article peer group.

Stoughton Police Chief Donna McNamara has led the force through years of tumult following the death of Sandra Birchmore, 23, a former participant in a police department youth program who was found dead in her Canton apartment on Feb. 
4, 2021. 
The Stoughton Police Department  tarnished by the Sandra Birchmore case and other scandals  faced fresh turmoil Wednesday as its first female chief publicly accused the town’s chief executive of trying to oust her without cause and an acting leader was installed to head the police agency. 
Stoughton Police Chief Donna McNamara learned Wednesday through news reports that one of her deputies, James O’Connor, had been installed as acting chief, her lawyer said. 
A news release from Stoughton Town Manager Thomas J. 
Calter announced O’Connor’s appointment, but made no mention of McNamara, who became acting chief in 2016 and was sworn in as chief the following year. 
Calter’s release said town officials do not “publicly discuss or disclose information” concerning personnel matters to “preserve all parties’ privacy interests and due process rights.” 
Calter did not respond Wednesday to messages seeking comment. 
McNamara’s lawyer said her client filed a harassment complaint against Calter with the Select Board on Monday. 
The complaint accuses Calter of “engaging in a pattern of gossip and disparagement” against McNamara, her lawyer, Leah Marie Barrault said in a statement. 
She further said Calter has directed “misogynistic words and actions” at McNamara and is discriminating against her because he “doesn’t want a female police chief.” 
“There’s no reason to want to get rid of her except for her gender because she’s done nothing wrong,” Barrault said. 
McNamara has led the department through years of tumult following the death of Birchmore, 23, a former participant in a Stoughton police youth program who was found dead in her Canton apartment on Feb. 
4, 2021. 
The state medical examiner initially ruled Birchmore killed herself and no criminal charges were filed in state court even as a Stoughton police internal affairs investigation found three officers violated department rules and regulations in their interactions with her. 
Barrault said McNamara’s decision to order the internal affairs investigation unearthed critical information about Birchmore’s death. 
She also credited her with bringing fresh attention to the case by holding a 2022 news conference announcing its findings against three officers: Matthew Farwell, his twin brother, William, and their mentor Robert C. 
Devine. 
William Farwell and Devine do not face any criminal charges. 
In April, the state Office of the Chief Medical Examiner amended its finding that Birchmore killed herself and changed her death certificate to list her manner of death as “undetermined.” 
Barrault said Calter initiated action against McNamara on July 7 when he summoned her to Town Hall, threatened her with termination if she did not resign, and told her not to report to work. 
Her client has not been placed on administrative leave, Barrault said. 
Calter told McNamara a complaint had been made about her, but did not reveal who complained or describe the allegations, Barrault said. 
McNamara followed Calter’s order to stay away from work even as he called and texted her “virtually every day” since the July 7 meeting, Barrault said. 
McNamara joined Stoughton police as a patrol officer in 2001 and rose through the ranks. 
She recently completed the first year of her third contract as chief, a three-year agreement, Barrault said. 
She said her client has never been disciplined or given a negative evaluation and highlighted her work revamping department procedures for processing evidence, facilitating its shift to a regional public safety dispatch service, and maintaining its state accreditation. 
Barrault said McNamara encountered sexism as she advanced professionally. 
“Every time she was promoted, men were not happy and she battled through it,” Barrault said. 
Calter has served as Stoughton’s town manager since 2022. 
He previously worked as the town administrator in Kingston, his hometown and one of the communities he served as member of the Massachusetts House of Representatives from 2007 to 2018. 
He resigned as town administrator in Kingston in 2020 before his contract expired, according to reports by the radio station WATD 95.9 and WickedLocal.com. 
Even before Birchmore’s death the Stoughton Police Department developed a reputation for scandals. 
The force has faced other state and federal criminal prosecutions of superior and rank-and-file officers and infighting that escalated into civil litigation. 
McNamara’s predecessor as chief, Paul Shastany, resigned from the department following an earlier scandal involving Devine. 
Shastany wanted Devine fired over the incident in which he directed a subordinate to investigate harassing messages he received as he tried to end an extramarital affair 
A police probe concluded Devine had been “untruthful by omission,” but Stoughton officials feared civil service laws would protect Devine and could possibly keep him in police leadership. 
Shastany left the department a short time later. 
In December, the Peace Officer Standards and Training Commission voted to decertify Devine, permanently barring him from serving as a police officer in the state. 
He has filed a lawsuit challenging the decertification. 
Laura Crimaldi can be reached at laura.crimaldi@globe.com. 
Follow her @lauracrimaldi. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.4%Laura Crimaldi: 2.1%Boston Globe: 3.0%Confirmation Bias6.4%This article: 4.5%Laura Crimaldi: 1.5%Boston Globe: 0.9%Anchoring Bias4.5%This article: 7.1%Laura Crimaldi: 2.4%Boston Globe: 3.3%Availability Heuristic7.1%This article: 1.5%Laura Crimaldi: 0.5%Boston Globe: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic1.5%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Laura Crimaldi: 1.6%Boston Globe: 5.2%Framing Effect4.9%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.7%Boston Globe: 0.6%Status Quo Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Laura Crimaldi: 0.8%Boston Globe: 1.2%Pessimism Bias2.4%This article: 26.5%Laura Crimaldi: 13.5%Boston Globe: 7.5%Negativity Bias26.5%This article: 6.3%Laura Crimaldi: 2.1%Boston Globe: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias6.3%This article: 6.2%Laura Crimaldi: 2.1%Boston Globe: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error6.2%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.6%Boston Globe: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.4%Laura Crimaldi: 9.6%Boston Globe: 4.1%Halo Effect8.4%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.5%Boston Globe: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.0%Laura Crimaldi: 1.0%Boston Globe: 1.4%Recency Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 1.9%Boston Globe: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 3.9%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 2.4%Laura Crimaldi: 1.6%Boston Globe: 1.1%False Dilemma2.4%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.1%Laura Crimaldi: 5.4%Boston Globe: 2.9%Hasty Generalization7.1%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 2.1%Boston Globe: 5.0%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.8%Boston Globe: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.9%Laura Crimaldi: 2.3%Boston Globe: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.9%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.5%Laura Crimaldi: 1.8%Boston Globe: 0.6%Burden of Proof5.5%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.4%Laura Crimaldi: 1.5%Boston Globe: 2.0%Anecdotal4.4%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.7%Boston Globe: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.4%Laura Crimaldi: 0.8%Boston Globe: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection2.4%This article: 2.9%Laura Crimaldi: 1.0%Boston Globe: 2.1%Biased Writer Voice2.9%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Crimaldi: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

861 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.