Topic summary
⁠26%3 analyzed articles/videos384 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Workplace Harassment results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 1,714 hits. Analysis detected 7,406 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,423 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,552 of 16,494 topics). This Workplace Harassment is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.
Workplace Harassment
Topic details
Total words: 9,423
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.0% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos