Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Laura Crimaldi results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 348 hits. Analysis detected 1,520 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,583 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,171 authors). This Laura Crimaldi is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Laura Crimaldi
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Laura Crimaldi (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,583
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.5%13.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 9.6%9.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 5.4%5.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Author 9.6%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Horn Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos