Keyword summary
78% 8 analyzed articles/videos 7,252 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conspiracy Theory results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 3,461 hits . Analysis detected 35,870 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,409 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (25,267 of 35,328 keywords). This Conspiracy Theory is better (less manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group. Conspiracy Theory
Keyword details
Total words: 31,409
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score8 analyzed articles31.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst