Keyword summary
56% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,133 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Columbia University results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 3,766 hits . Analysis detected 30,953 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,405 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (26,042 of 37,536 keywords). This Columbia University is better (less manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group. Columbia University
Keyword details
Total words: 28,405
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles28.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst