Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,813 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sahar Delijani results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 1,097 hits . Analysis detected 6,571 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,252 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,335 of 6,628 authors). This Sahar Delijani is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group. Sahar Delijani
Author details
Total words: 7,252
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.7% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.1% 15.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst