Keyword summary
78% 21 analyzed articles/videos 13,914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These College Football results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 5,416 hits . Analysis detected 60,681 faulty-reasoning hits from 52,477 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (26,019 of 37,536 keywords). This College Football is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group. College Football
Keyword details
Total words: 52,477
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.7% percentile 2.2% BS Score21 analyzed articles52.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst