Keyword summary
61% 11 analyzed articles/videos 3,514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cato Institute results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 2,781 hits . Analysis detected 27,107 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,265 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (21,326 of 37,536 keywords). This Cato Institute is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group. Cato Institute
Keyword details
Total words: 21,265
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.2% percentile 2.6% BS Score11 analyzed articles21.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst