Keyword summary
66% 33 analyzed articles/videos 29,839 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Border Patrol results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 23,021 hits . Analysis detected 148,591 faulty-reasoning hits from 131,930 analyzed words across 33 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (24,945 of 35,700 keywords). This Border Patrol is better (less manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group. Border Patrol
Keyword details
Total words: 131,930
Article count: 33
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score33 analyzed articles131.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.4% 17.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst