Keyword summary
48% 11 analyzed articles/videos 8,983 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Black Lives Matter results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 3,860 hits . Analysis detected 42,601 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,628 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,849 of 37,536 keywords). This Black Lives Matter is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group. Black Lives Matter
Keyword details
Total words: 36,628
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score11 analyzed articles36.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst