Keyword summary
57% 18 analyzed articles/videos 17,262 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Biden Administration results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 8,775 hits . Analysis detected 90,157 faulty-reasoning hits from 105,492 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (30,746 of 34,301 keywords). This Biden Administration is better (less manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group. Biden Administration
Keyword details
Total words: 105,492
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score18 analyzed articles105.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst