Author summary
92% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,153 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew G. Andersson results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 34.4% saturation with 2,637 hits . Analysis detected 17,596 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,666 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,103 of 6,363 authors). This Matthew G. Andersson is worse (more manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group. Matthew G. Andersson
Author details
Total words: 7,666
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.7% percentile 5.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 34.4% 34.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 23.3% 23.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.0% 17.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 13.0% 13.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 16.6% 16.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 10.5% 10.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.9% 5.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Hasty Generalization: Author 34.4%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 23.3%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Author 18.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 16.6%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 13.0%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.7% Slippery Slope: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst