Keyword summary
24% 8 analyzed articles/videos 3,137 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Austin results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 1,209 hits . Analysis detected 12,405 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,278 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (32,966 of 36,713 keywords). This Austin is better (less manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group. Austin
Keyword details
Total words: 19,278
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score8 analyzed articles19.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst