Two teenagers arrested for 10 ‘random’ shootings in Texas crime spree, police say 

By Katie Hawkinson0%

5/18/2026, 12:19:20 AM

Topics: Austin, Texas

BS Summary: The article has not yet been analyzed.

Police have arrested two teenagers in connection with at least 10 shootings that took place in Austin, Texas over the weekend. 
At least four people have been shot, Austin Police Chief Lisa Davis said Sunday. 
One person sustained a “serious injury,” while the others have non-life-threatening injuries, she added. 
Two suspects  a 15-year-old and a 17-year-old  are now in custody following a string of shootings on Saturday and Sunday that also involved robberies and stolen vehicles, according to police. 
A third suspect may still be “at large,” the Austin Police Department said earlier on Sunday. 
A shelter-in-place order during the crime spree was briefly in place for the South Austin area before their arrest. 
The shootings appeared to be “random” with “no specific motive,” according to Davis. 
“I don’t know what motive would drive anybody to drive around senselessly in multiple parts of the city, shooting,” Davis told reporters Sunday evening. 
“These are dangerous kids out causing havoc in the city.” 
The 17-year-old suspect had a warrant for stealing a gun at the same store from which the 15-year-old suspect is accused of stealing a firearm, Davis said. 
Police were first alerted to a stolen car at an apartment complex and later to the firearm theft, but investigators initially did not know the cases were connected, Davis said. 
Davis said the suspects have used several different cars, including a black or dark blue Hyundai, a gold Hyundai sedan, a silver Mazda four-door and a white Kia Optima. 
“I want to remind people, do not leave their cars unlocked. 
What we are seeing are these cars are being stolen. 
Do not leave your keys in the vehicle or your key fobs in the vehicle,” she said Sunday. 
Two of the shootings took place at Austin Fire Department stations. 
A firetruck was struck in one of the incidents, Davis said. 
No firefighters were injured, with only “minor damage reported to at least one fire apparatus and both fire stations,” the Austin Firefighters Association said in a statement. 
The city’s firefighters remain “fully staffed, operational, and responding to multiple shootings across the city,” according to the association. 
Austin Mayor Kirk Watson has asked residents to “remain vigilant” and report any suspicious activity to police. 
“If you see something suspicious, call 911 immediately. 
Stay safe,” Davis added. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 1.7%The Independent: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.1%The Independent: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Katie Hawkinson: 2.4%The Independent: 3.2%Availability Heuristic3.3%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.3%The Independent: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.1%The Independent: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 3.5%The Independent: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 5.5%The Independent: 8.2%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.4%The Independent: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.1%The Independent: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.2%The Independent: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 1.5%The Independent: 2.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.8%The Independent: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 27.4%Katie Hawkinson: 7.8%The Independent: 12.1%Negativity Bias27.4%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 2.6%The Independent: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.4%The Independent: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.0%The Independent: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 3.1%The Independent: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.6%The Independent: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 4.2%The Independent: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 2.5%Katie Hawkinson: 0.1%The Independent: 0.3%Horn Effect2.5%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 2.1%The Independent: 1.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.3%The Independent: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Katie Hawkinson: 1.6%The Independent: 2.2%Ad Hominem2.5%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.5%The Independent: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 2.5%The Independent: 3.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.9%The Independent: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.0%The Independent: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.4%The Independent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 2.0%The Independent: 4.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.9%The Independent: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.2%The Independent: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.0%Katie Hawkinson: 4.0%The Independent: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion6.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.5%The Independent: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 1.5%The Independent: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.8%The Independent: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.8%The Independent: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.1%The Independent: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 1.6%The Independent: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 1.3%The Independent: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.6%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 2.2%The Independent: 2.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 1.8%The Independent: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 5.0%The Independent: 7.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 16.1%Katie Hawkinson: 0.5%The Independent: 1.3%Indoctrination16.1%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 1.5%The Independent: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 1.1%The Independent: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Hawkinson: 0.3%The Independent: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

398 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers72%attributed speech113writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Davis • 14 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Davis • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageAustin Police Department • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Davis • 13 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Davis • 24 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Davis • 10 words • 100.0% coverageLisa Davis • 27 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Davis • 30 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Davis • 29 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Davis • 11 words • 100.0% coverageLisa Davis • 10 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Davis • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Davis • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAustin Firefighters Association • 27 words • 0.0% coverageAustin Firefighters Association • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageLisa Davis • 8 words • 100.0% coverageLisa Davis • 4 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Lisa Davis

44%flagged-word coverage
223 attributed words78% of attributed speech53% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Indoctrination+6.0 ptsWriter: 15.0%Lisa Davis: 21.1%21.1%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.