These 8 US housing markets favor buyers 74%

By Eric Revell74%

4/10/2026, 6:16:35 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 32.7% saturation with 148 hits. Analysis detected 1,081 faulty-reasoning hits from 452 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 66.4% and a BS Rank of 74% (5,497 of 21,176 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 74.00% of the article peer group.

The climate of the U.S. housing market for buyers varies around the country, and a new report suggests there are currently only eight metro areas that are truly buyer's markets. 
The economist research team at Realtor.com released a diagnostic tool called the Market Clock that tracks the housing market at the national and metro level based on months of supply, time on market, price changes and list-to-sale ratio to reflect local conditions. 
It tracks the 50 largest metros in the U.S. and found in its first quarterly report that about half, or 46%, of the top markets are in balance with neither buyers nor sellers having an edge; while 26% are seller's markets and only 16% are buyer's markets. 
The eight buyer's markets are mostly located in the South, though there is one outlier in the West. 
None of the buyer's markets were located in the Northeast or Midwest, where strong demand and restricted supply have either kept the housing market in balance or given sellers the edge. 
PROPERTY TAX BURDEN ON AMERICANS CLIMBS AS HOME VALUES DIP, NEW DATA SHOWS 
For all the eight buyer's markets, the Market Clock is at 5 o'clock, which signals they have ample supply of homes for sale with a growing number of listings and sellers lowering prices. 
Half of the buyer's markets are located in Florida  Jacksonville, Miami, Orlando and Tampa. 
The others are Atlanta, Georgia; Austin, Texas; Nashville, Tennessee; and Riverside, California. 
HOUSING MARKET GAINING MOMENTUM AS SPRING SEASON BEGINS 
Realtor.com senior economist Jake Krimmel said that while active listings may not have risen year over year in each of the eight buyer's markets, "Riverside and Nashville, for instance, have seen active listings increase 222% and 330%, respectively, since high interest rates reset the market in 2022  significantly greater than the national average of 172% since March 2022," he said. 
THESE 10 HOUSING MARKETS GIVE FIRST-TIME BUYERS THE BEST SHOT AT HOMEOWNERSHIP IN 2026 
The report noted that compared with June 2025, Atlanta, Austin, Nashville and Riverside all saw their position on the market clock loosen by one "hour" into an early buyer's market from a late balanced market. 
Jacksonville followed a similar pattern, moving from being in balance to a buyer's market. 
By contrast, Miami, Orlando and Tampa were already early buyer's markets in June and held steady at that level through the end of last year. 
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE 
Krimmel said that prospective buyers in all the eight metros have both time and options on their side this spring, giving them the opportunity to exert leverage up to a point when negotiating prices and concessions with sellers. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.4%Eric Revell: 2.6%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Confirmation Bias12.4%This article: 15.0%Eric Revell: 4.7%FoxBusiness: 3.5%Anchoring Bias15.0%This article: 23.9%Eric Revell: 3.6%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Availability Heuristic23.9%This article: 17.0%Eric Revell: 1.3%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic17.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 15.7%Eric Revell: 3.0%FoxBusiness: 3.7%Overconfidence Bias15.7%This article: 4.6%Eric Revell: 11.0%FoxBusiness: 13.0%Framing Effect4.6%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 1.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 13.3%Eric Revell: 9.5%FoxBusiness: 8.8%Optimism Bias13.3%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 1.7%FoxBusiness: 2.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Eric Revell: 6.9%FoxBusiness: 7.8%Negativity Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 2.5%FoxBusiness: 4.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.6%FoxBusiness: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%Eric Revell: 3.1%FoxBusiness: 3.9%Halo Effect9.3%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 13.5%Eric Revell: 2.8%FoxBusiness: 2.3%Recency Bias13.5%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 32.7%Eric Revell: 6.7%FoxBusiness: 7.2%Appeal to Authority32.7%This article: 6.9%Eric Revell: 1.2%FoxBusiness: 1.6%False Dilemma6.9%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 23.2%Eric Revell: 4.2%FoxBusiness: 6.3%Hasty Generalization23.2%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.9%Eric Revell: 3.4%FoxBusiness: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion2.9%This article: 7.3%Eric Revell: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Begging the Question7.3%This article: 13.5%Eric Revell: 3.9%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)13.5%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.2%Eric Revell: 2.1%FoxBusiness: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.2%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.5%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Middle Ground5.5%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 1.3%FoxBusiness: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.3%Eric Revell: 3.2%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice7.3%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 1.9%FoxBusiness: 1.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 2.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Eric Revell: 2.8%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.0%

452 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker22%attributed speech353writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJake Krimmel • 61 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageJake Krimmel • 38 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jake Krimmel

100%flagged-word coverage
99 attributed words100% of attributed speech97% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-9.3 ptsWriter: 9.3%Jake Krimmel: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.5 ptsWriter: 2.5%Jake Krimmel: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.