Speaker summary
⁠32%2 analyzed articles/videos779.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jake Krimmel results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Overconfidence Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 129 hits. Analysis detected 1,107.902 faulty-reasoning hits from 779.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (27,804 of 28,364 speakers). This Jake Krimmel is better (less manipulative) than 98.00% of the peer group.
Jake Krimmel
Speaker details
Total words: 779.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751002.0% percentile
4.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos779.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos