Topic summary
65% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,160 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Market Trends results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 1,812 hits . Analysis detected 18,783 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,001 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (10,408 of 16,562 topics). This Market Trends is better (less manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group. Market Trends
Topic details
Total words: 18,001
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.2% percentile 2.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles18K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.4% 7.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst