Author summary
71%1 analyzed article/video1,013 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph Gonzalez results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 563 hits. Analysis detected 2,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,039 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,128 of 6,359 authors). This Joseph Gonzalez is worse (more manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Joseph Gonzalez
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
51%Joseph Gonzalez (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,039
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

51% percentile
025507510050.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 18.5%18.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 13.9%13.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Author 18.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Author 8.8%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos