Keyword summary
31%1 analyzed article/video1,070 analyzed words
BS Summary: These "ann Widdecombe" results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 413 hits. Analysis detected 2,642 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,280 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (29,225 of 34,789 keywords). This "ann Widdecombe" is better (less manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group.
"ann Widdecombe"
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
16%"ann Widdecombe" (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

16% percentile
025507510016.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate