Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video954 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oliver JJ Lane results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 379 hits. Analysis detected 3,129 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,816 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,089 of 6,316 authors). This Oliver JJ Lane is worse (more manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Oliver JJ Lane
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
52%Oliver JJ Lane (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,816
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

51% percentile
025507510051.1% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.2%7.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos