Keyword summary
71%10 analyzed articles/videos6,362 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Agents results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 3,136 hits. Analysis detected 32,385 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,985 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (25,541 of 36,957 keywords). This Ai Agents is better (less manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group.
Ai Agents
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
31%Ai Agents (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

31% percentile
025507510030.9% percentile
2.2% BS Score10 analyzed articles29K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.3%6.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate