Author summary
89% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,078 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vala Afshar results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 1,433 hits . Analysis detected 8,863 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,530 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,237 of 6,628 authors). This Vala Afshar is worse (more manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group. Vala Afshar
Author details
Total words: 7,530
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.3% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 19.0% 19.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 17.2% 17.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.6% 4.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 8.2% 8.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Author 19.0%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 17.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst