Author summary
40% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,865 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Hawking results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 1,561 hits . Analysis detected 6,835 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,460 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,683 of 7,552 authors). This Tom Hawking is worse (more manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group. Tom Hawking
Author details
Total words: 7,460
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.2% percentile 2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 20.9% 20.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.7% 12.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst