August stargazing: A planet parade, two eclipses, and one scary star 16%

By Tom Hawking41%

7/31/2026, 6:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including no named faulty reasoning patterns yet, with no single egregious example has been isolated yet. Analysis detected 1,862 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,030 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 28.9% and a BS Rank of 16% (19,943 of 23,718 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 84.10% of the article peer group.

August 1 The Summer Triangle August 12 Six Planets in Alignment August 12 Full Solar Eclipse August 12–13 Perseids Meteor Shower Predicted Peak August 27–28 Partial Lunar Eclipse August 28 Full Sturgeon Moon 
If you’re one of our European readers, then August is potentially a particularly big month. 
A full solar eclipse will sweep across parts of several countries including Spain and Iceland on August 12. 
But even if you’re not, there’s still plenty to see this month, from a new planetary parade to a Lovecraftian horror lurking in plain sight. 
Let’s get started. 
August 1: The Summer Triangle 
If it’s summer—and boy, is it ever summer—then it must be time for the Summer Triangle . 
If you look skyward as another long day recedes into another hot, sleepless night, you’ll see the triangular formation. 
The stars Vega, Deneb, and Altair shining bright in the southern sky form this seasonal shape. 
As the Farmer’s Almanac explains , although the stars appear close from our perspective, they’re actually a long way from one another. 
Altair is 17 light-years away, and Vega is another eight light-years out, putting it at 25 light-years away from Earth. 
While Deneb appears similar to its two companions, it’s actually orders of magnitude further away. 
Estimates of exactly how far vary from about 1,400 light-years to 2,600 light-years. 
The reason it looks as bright to us as Vega and Altair is because it’s huge . 
It’s an extremely rare blue supergiant. 
Deneb is anywhere between 55,000 and 196,000 the mass of our sun. 
If it magically replaced the sun, Deneb would swallow the planets Mercury and Venus whole. 
If our upper estimates on the star’s size are correct, it would swallow Earth too —and if not, never fear, it’d simply cook our planet into blasted uninhabitability. 
If you’re still up for looking at the relatively benign Altair and Vega, along with the cosmic horror that is Deneb, crane your neck upwards , look south, and be glad that the star at the apex of the triangle you see is a long, long way away. 
August 12: Six Planets in Alignment 
From a triangle to a  hexagon? 
Sort of. 
August 12 is a big day for those of a stargazing persuasion. 
It begins with a chance to see six planets in alignment. 
But wait, who’s missing? 
Venus has thumbed her regal nose at this month’s gathering—the Goddess of Love prefers to shine on her own, thank you very much. 
That leaves Mercury, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune, and Uranus left at the planet party. 
They’ll stretch across the sky like a string of Christmas lights than the regular hexagon that you’ll find in a geometry textbook. 
But look, if its internal angles sum to 720°, we’re claiming it. 
As per Starwalk , the best time to catch the planets on parade will be just about an hour before dawn on August 12, with the planets rising in the eastern sky and moving southwest. 
The two easiest planets to spot will be Mars and Saturn, both of which should be visible with the naked eye. 
August 12: Full Solar Eclipse 
If you happen to be in Greenland, Iceland, northern Russia or northern Spain, then a genuinely profound experience is heading your way. 
Popular Science was lucky enough to catch the total solar eclipse visible from North America in April 2024, and it’s a remarkable feeling to watch the sun disappear, replaced by a black disc and a ghostly silver corona, while darkness sweeps across the landscape. 
Birds stop singing, the temperature drops, and for a moment it’s midnight. 
And then it’s over. 
NASA has details on exactly when and where the path of totality falls this time around. 
August 12–13: Perseids Meteor Shower Predicted Peak 
As if a planetary parade and a total solar eclipse weren’t enough for one day, the night of August 12 and early morning of August 13 will also be the best time to see this year’s Perseids meteor shower . 
This will be a particularly good year to spot this iconic meteor shower, given that the meteors will be streaking through a moonless sky. 
Look to the constellation Perseus, which will be high in the northeastern sky. 
EarthSky suggests looking just before dawn for the best chance of seeing the shower in all its glory. 
August 27–28: Partial Lunar Eclipse 
Look, it’s not a solar eclipse, but for those of us in North America who’ll miss out on the spectacle of the disappearing sun, there’s a pretty decent consolation prize in the form of an almost-full lunar eclipse . 
A lunar eclipse happens when the moon falls into the Earth’s shadow. 
Instead of disappearing completely, the moon turns a deep shade of red, which is why these eclipses are often called “blood moons”. 
(Why? 
All the answers you seek are here .) 
This one will begin at around 10:30pm ET, with the maximum eclipse—where 96.2 percent of the moon’s surface will be covered in shadow —reached at 12:12 a.m. 
EDT on August 28. 
It will be visible across the entire contiguous United States and in Hawaii. 
Only the western part of Alaska that misses out. 
August 28: Full Sturgeon Moon 
One day after its encounter with the Earth’s shadow, almost to the minute, the moon will reach peak illumination for this month. 
At 12:18 a.m. 
EDT, the full Sturgeon Moon will shine in all its glory. 
According to the Farmer’s Almanac, the name comes from the giant fish that once swam in abundance in the Great Lakes of North America. 
The arrival of European settlers led to a predictable and depressing decline in their numbers, and the once-common lake sturgeon is now considered Endangered by the International Union for Conservation of Nature. 
Remember that you’ll get the best experience gazing at the cosmos if you get away from any sources of light pollution, give your eyeballs some time to adjust to the darkness, and review our stargazing tips before setting out into the night. 
The post August stargazing: A planet parade, two eclipses, and one scary star appeared first on Popular Science . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.9%Tom Hawking: 4.0%Popular Science: 2.2%Confirmation Bias3.9%This article: 3.4%Tom Hawking: 1.0%Popular Science: 0.8%Anchoring Bias3.4%This article: 5.4%Tom Hawking: 2.6%Popular Science: 2.6%Availability Heuristic5.4%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.7%Popular Science: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.9%Popular Science: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%Tom Hawking: 0.3%Popular Science: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias1.3%This article: 5.7%Tom Hawking: 4.1%Popular Science: 3.4%Framing Effect5.7%This article: 7.9%Tom Hawking: 1.6%Popular Science: 0.4%Loss Aversion7.9%This article: 4.1%Tom Hawking: 0.6%Popular Science: 0.7%Status Quo Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.3%Popular Science: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.6%Tom Hawking: 1.9%Popular Science: 4.5%Optimism Bias8.6%This article: 3.9%Tom Hawking: 1.4%Popular Science: 0.7%Pessimism Bias3.9%This article: 12.7%Tom Hawking: 12.7%Popular Science: 3.0%Negativity Bias12.7%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.3%Popular Science: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 1.4%Popular Science: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Tom Hawking: 2.9%Popular Science: 0.4%In-Group Bias7.4%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Popular Science: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.4%Tom Hawking: 0.5%Popular Science: 0.9%Recency Bias0.4%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.1%Popular Science: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.6%Tom Hawking: 2.3%Popular Science: 4.1%Appeal to Authority9.6%This article: 5.4%Tom Hawking: 1.6%Popular Science: 0.7%False Dilemma5.4%This article: 1.5%Tom Hawking: 0.2%Popular Science: 0.3%Slippery Slope1.5%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.9%Popular Science: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.3%Tom Hawking: 3.7%Popular Science: 4.1%Hasty Generalization4.3%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.4%Popular Science: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 19.7%Tom Hawking: 8.9%Popular Science: 2.8%Appeal to Emotion19.7%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.3%Popular Science: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.8%Tom Hawking: 2.8%Popular Science: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.8%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.1%Tom Hawking: 0.9%Popular Science: 0.5%Burden of Proof4.1%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.4%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.3%Tom Hawking: 1.7%Popular Science: 2.1%Anecdotal4.3%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.5%Popular Science: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.6%Tom Hawking: 2.4%Popular Science: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.6%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.3%Popular Science: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 1.1%Popular Science: 1.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.1%Tom Hawking: 0.7%Popular Science: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection2.1%This article: 45.1%Tom Hawking: 20.9%Popular Science: 3.7%Biased Writer Voice45.1%This article: 4.1%Tom Hawking: 1.0%Popular Science: 1.3%Indoctrination4.1%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Tom Hawking: 4.0%Popular Science: 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…7.5%

1030 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers3.3%attributed speech996writer words
Selected voice

EarthSky

100%flagged-word coverage
18 attributed words53% of attributed speech63% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Biased Writer Voice-46.7 ptsWriter: 46.7%EarthSky: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -7.7 ptsWriter: 7.7%EarthSky: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-4.2 ptsWriter: 4.2%EarthSky: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.2 ptsWriter: 2.2%EarthSky: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.