Keyword summary
11%2 analyzed articles/videos575 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Planets results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 265 hits. Analysis detected 2,308 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,128 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (27,347 of 34,833 keywords). This Planets is better (less manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group.
Planets
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
22%Planets (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,128
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

22% percentile
025507510021.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos