Gizmodo71%

61-Year-Old Japanese Man Arrested After Decade of Rocking Too Hard 65%

By Tom Hawking40%

7/31/2026, 5:35:39 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including no named faulty reasoning patterns yet, with no single egregious example has been isolated yet. Analysis detected 1,182 faulty-reasoning hits from 433 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (8,402 of 23,599 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 64.40% of the article peer group.

We’ve all had nightmare neighbors, but spare a thought for the residents of Kyoto’s Nishikyo neighborhood, who’ve spent the last decade putting up with one Kazunori Yokoi, a man who sounds like he could be a strong contender for the title of Japan’s worst neighbor. 
Yokoi, 61, was arrested this week after allegedly having spent the last decade tormenting his fellow residents by blasting his radio and playing his electric guitar at obnoxious volumes. 
As per Kyodo News, Yokoi has been the subject of multiple complaints over the years, and has continued making a racket despite “officers repeatedly warn[ing] Yokoi.” 
Apparently three of his neighbors, each aged somewhere between their 60s and 80s, have “developed health problems because of the prolonged noise,” including depression and, unsurprisingly, sleep deprivation. 
Another woman aged in her 60s allegedly developed tinnitus over the course of the two-ish years between April 2025 and Yokoi’s arrest. 
The report suggests that his electric guitar was measured between 80 dB and 90 dB. 
The former compares to the sound of a passing truck or motorcycle, or perhaps a police siren; the latter is more like a subway train or a power tool. 
Most scales also note that sounds above 85 dB are considered harmful. 
Why Yokoi allegedly behaved like this is unclear. 
Reports note that he placed his radio in the window and directed it toward the street, which suggests that he may have held animus toward his neighbors. 
A report from News on Japan says that the radio was on around the clock, with one resident explaining, “The music was hard rock… playing 24 hours a day.” 
The amplified electric guitar, meanwhile, “began  from early in the morning.” 
In any case, it seems that authorities finally got as sick of receiving complaints about Yokoi as his neighbors were of making them, because as well as arresting him, police also confiscated a bunch of guitars, amplifiers, and other assorted pieces of noise-making equipment from his apartment. 
In total, 76 items were seized, which truly makes you wonder what on earth Yokoi was up to in there. 
Yokoi himself was unrepentant: according to News on Japan, he “admitted producing the noise but denied that his actions caused any injuries.” 
It does make you wonder why it took a decade and an unfortunate woman developing tinnitus for authorities to finally act, though. 
Yokoi will have his day in court, and we look forward to hearing his of what could go down as one of the most epic noise complaint sagas in history. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.0%Tom Hawking: 4.0%Gizmodo: 4.0%Confirmation Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 1.0%Gizmodo: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 21.7%Tom Hawking: 2.6%Gizmodo: 3.1%Availability Heuristic21.7%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.7%Gizmodo: 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 10.9%Tom Hawking: 0.9%Gizmodo: 0.7%Hindsight Bias10.9%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.3%Gizmodo: 2.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 17.1%Tom Hawking: 4.1%Gizmodo: 5.6%Framing Effect17.1%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 1.6%Gizmodo: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.6%Gizmodo: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Tom Hawking: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect5.1%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 1.9%Gizmodo: 3.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 11.5%Tom Hawking: 1.4%Gizmodo: 2.1%Pessimism Bias11.5%This article: 51.7%Tom Hawking: 12.7%Gizmodo: 7.7%Negativity Bias51.7%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Tom Hawking: 1.4%Gizmodo: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error6.2%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 2.9%Gizmodo: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Gizmodo: 2.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.9%Tom Hawking: 0.5%Gizmodo: 1.5%Recency Bias6.9%This article: 2.3%Tom Hawking: 0.1%Gizmodo: 0.3%Primacy Effect2.3%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Gizmodo: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.9%Tom Hawking: 2.3%Gizmodo: 4.2%Appeal to Authority13.9%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 1.6%Gizmodo: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.9%Gizmodo: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 3.7%Gizmodo: 5.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.4%Gizmodo: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 15.0%Tom Hawking: 8.9%Gizmodo: 4.8%Appeal to Emotion15.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 27.5%Tom Hawking: 2.8%Gizmodo: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)27.5%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.1%Tom Hawking: 0.9%Gizmodo: 0.5%Burden of Proof5.1%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.5%Tom Hawking: 1.7%Gizmodo: 1.9%Anecdotal9.5%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.5%Gizmodo: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.2%Tom Hawking: 2.4%Gizmodo: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.2%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.5%Tom Hawking: 1.1%Gizmodo: 4.4%Unattributed Quote9.5%This article: 6.7%Tom Hawking: 0.7%Gizmodo: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection6.7%This article: 40.2%Tom Hawking: 20.9%Gizmodo: 13.3%Biased Writer Voice40.2%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 1.0%Gizmodo: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Gizmodo: 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Hawking: 4.0%Gizmodo: 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

433 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers11%attributed speech385writer words
Selected voice

Kyodo News

100%flagged-word coverage
26 attributed words54% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Biased Writer Voice-45.2 ptsWriter: 45.2%Kyodo News: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-10.6 ptsWriter: 10.6%Kyodo News: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-7.5 ptsWriter: 7.5%Kyodo News: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.