Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,030 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sophie Bates results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 1,022 hits . Analysis detected 5,142 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,120 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 26% (4,864 of 6,498 authors). This Sophie Bates is better (less manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group. Sophie Bates
Author details
Total words: 8,120
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.3% 11.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.6% 12.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst