Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 913 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gerald Herbert results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 506 hits . Analysis detected 2,104 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,652 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 48% (3,361 of 6,362 authors). This Gerald Herbert is better (less manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group. Gerald Herbert
Author details
Total words: 3,652
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.2% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.9% 13.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.7% 12.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Personal Incredulity: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst