Author summary
39% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,135 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Seewer results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 766 hits . Analysis detected 3,022 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,318 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (2,873 of 6,358 authors). This John Seewer is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group. John Seewer
Author details
Total words: 4,318
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.8% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.0% 12.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst